No one has the right to ban any books. That's called censorship, and it is unconstitutional. It is a violation of the first amendment. If parents don't want their children to read certain material, that's up to them, but they have no right to decide what children other than their own may or may not read. This is not Nazi Germany or Communist China where great works of literature were once burned, and that's what this kind of censorship amounts to.
Why do so may people of this country always want to ban things they don't like? It violates the civil liberties of those who are not in agreement. It is a lazy way of dealing with things. Rather than exercise restraint or monitor their own children, they would prefer to deny choices to others. They are entirely too willing to allow the government or some other entity to decide what's good for everyone. The foundation of this country is based on the freedom to make our own choices. Giving up our freedoms to allow others to make decisions for us is irresponsible and just plain lazy.
Why do so may people of this country always want to ban things they don't like? It violates the civil liberties of those who are not in agreement. It is a lazy way of dealing with things. Rather than exercise restraint or monitor their own children, they would prefer to deny choices to others. They are entirely too willing to allow the government or some other entity to decide what's good for everyone. The foundation of this country is based on the freedom to make our own choices. Giving up our freedoms to allow others to make decisions for us is irresponsible and just plain lazy.